A socio-pragmatic study of address terms in Kurdish

Authors

  • Sara Jamal Mohammed English Department, Faculty of Education, Koya University, Koya, Kurdistan Region, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32410/huj-10478

Keywords:

Address terms, Social context, Interloctutors, Kurdish

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the address terms in Kurdish language within the theory of politeness. It deals with the six major groups of terms of address. The most vital forms are identified through this study concerning each category, their social sense, and the factors that govern their usage. The number of participants were 100 Kurdish adults who were randomly selected form various public places. The main used methods for collecting data are questionnaire and interviewing participants. The reflection of the Kurdish terms of address on complex social relationship is highlighted through the results of the study between interlocutors. Various social factors have a great role in selecting a given term’s determination, for instance, gender, intimacy, formality, age, social status and familiarity between the interlocutor and the addressee. Each category of address terms are utilized by a specific group of users in various social domains.

 

References

Afful, J. Address Terms among University Students in Ghana: The Case of Descriptive Phrases. The International journal of Language Society and Culture, 20, 50, (2007).

Braun, F. Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouto De Gruyter, (1998).

Brown, P., and Levinson, S. Politeness: Some language universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (1987).

Brown, R. and Gilman, A. The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in Language (p.253-276). Massachusetts: MIT Press, (1966).

Culpeper, J. Historical sociopragmatics. Historical Sociopragmatics, 1-144. (2011).

Dickey, E. Forms of address and terms of reference. Journal of Linguistics, 33(2), 255-274. doi:10.1017/S0022226797006488, (1997).

Dunkling, L. A Dictionary of Epithets and Terms of Address. New york: Routledge, (1990).

Ervin-Tripp, S. Sociolinguistic Rules of Address. In J.B. Pride, & Janet Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (p.225-240). London: Penguin Education, (1970).

Esmae'li, S. Terms of Address Usage: The Case of Iranian Spouses. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1 (9) 183-188, (2001).

Holms, J. An introduction to sociolinguistics. London: Longman, 1992.

House, J. (1998). Politeness and Translation. In The Pragmatics of Translation, Kickey, L. (ed), pp.54-71. UK: Cromwell Press Ltd.

Hwang, S. Terms of address: in Korean and American culter's. International Communication studies 1(2). http://web.uri.edu/iaics/files/08-Shin-Ja-J.-Hwang.

Keshavarz, M. The role of social context, intimacy and distance in the choice of forms of address. International of the Society of Language, 148, 5-18, (2001).

Leech, Geoffrey N. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman, (1983).

Mazzon, G. Pronouns and Normal Address in Shakespearian English. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker (Eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems (p. 223- 250). Philadelphia: John Benjamines B.V., (2002).

Mahzad Mardiha. The Role of Age and Gender in the Choice of Address

Forms: A Sociolinguistic Study. Retrived from:

http://www.journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJALEL/article/view/765, (2012).

,(4), 172-182.

Moghaddam, A. S., Yazdanpanah, L., and Abolhassanizadeh, V. The Analysis of Persian Address Terms Based on theTheory of Politeness. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 10(3), p55 (2013).

Nevala, M. Inside and out. Forms of address in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century letters. Journal of historical pragmatics, 5(2): 271–296 (2004).

Oyetade, S. O. (1995). A sociolinguistic analysis of address forms in Yoruba. Language in society, 24(4), 515-535.

Parkinson, D. Constructing the Social Context of Communication: Terms of Adress in Egyption Arabic. Berlin: Mouto De Gruyter, (1985).

Pearson, J. C. Gender and Communication. Iowa: Wm. C. Brown, (1985).

Salihu H. The Sociolinguistics Study of Gender Address Patterns in the Hausa Society. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 4 (1), (2014).

Taavitsainen, I. and Jucker A. Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, (2002).

Verschureren, Jef. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold, (1999).

Wardhauh, R. Introduction to Sociolinguistics. 5 th edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, (2006).

Yule, G. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press: New York, (1996).

Published

2023-09-30

How to Cite

Mohammed, S. J. (2023). A socio-pragmatic study of address terms in Kurdish : . Halabja University Journal, 8(3), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.32410/huj-10478

Similar Articles

1-10 of 163

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.