Basis and advantages performing principle of complementarity by the international criminal court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32410/huj-10368Keywords:
International criminal court, Principle of complementary, National criminal justice, National jurisdicationAbstract
International criminal court (ICC) It shall be a permanent institution and shall have the power to exercise its jurisdiction over natural persons for the most serious crimes of international concern, as referred to in its Statute (ICC statute), such as Genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crime of aggression. ICC statute emphasizing that the ICC shall be complementary to national criminal jurisdictions, ICC wants to complement national judicial system not replace them, in this sense it recalling that it is the duty of every State to exercise its criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes. Complementarity is meant to close gaps in the task of prosecuting perpetrators of international crimes. The principle of complementarity only allows the court to investigate and prosecute crimes and perpetrators, where the concerned state is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution. The important and main advantages and rationales behind the principle of complementarity are affirming that the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole must not go unpunished. Prosecutions at the domestic level are generally preferred to perform before the ICC because as it generally favours a better access to evidence and testimony and tends to favour the participation to the trial of victims and witnesses and complementarity protects national sovereignty and at the same time promotes state action.
References
یەکەم: کتێب بە زمانی ئینگلیزی
- Mark Klamberg, Commentary on the law of the international criminal court, Torkel Opsahl academic epublisher, Brussels, 2017.
- Mohamed M. El Zeidy, the principle of complementarity in international criminal law: origin, development and practice, published by Martinus Nijhoff publishers and VSP, Leiden. Boston, The Netherlands, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004166936.i-368
- Nidal Nabil Jurdi, the international criminal court and national courts a contentious relationship, first published by Routledge, New York, NY 10017, USA, 2016.
- Otto Triffterer and Kai Ambos, the Rome statute of the international criminal court a commentary, third edition, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845263571
- Ovo Catherine Lomedemhe, the complementarity regime of the international criminal court, national implementation in Africa, Springer international publishing AG, 2017.
- Roberto Bellelli, international criminal justice law and practice from the Rome statute to its review, first published by Routledge, New York, NY 10017, USA, 2016.
- Robert Cryer, Hakan Friman, Darryl Robinson, Elizabeth Wilmshurst, an introduction to international criminal law and procedure, second edition, Cambridge University press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760808
دووەم: دکتۆرانامە بە زمانی ئینگلیزیی
- Beatric Pisani, the system of the international criminal court: complementarity in international criminal justice, PhD. Thesis in international studies- XXII Cycle, school of international studies, university of Trento, 2012.
- Emilie Hunter, the international criminal court and positive complementarity: the impact of ICC’s admissibility law and practice on domestic jurisdictions, thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of doctor of laws of the European university institute, 2014.
- Milton Odhiambo Owuor, the international criminal court and positive complementarity: legal and institutional framework, a thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of laws (LLD) in international criminal law, department of public law, faculty of law, university of Pretoria, 2017.
- Rod A. Rastan, closing the enforcement gap: the international criminal court and national authorities, thesis submitted for the degree of doctor of philosophy in law, London school of economic and political science, University of London, 2006.
سێیەم: پەیڕەوی بنەڕەتی دادگا و دەستووری نەتەوە یەکگرتووەکان
- Rome statute of the International criminal court, 1998.
- United Nations charter, 1945.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 SettingsAwara H. Ahmed,SettingsZana R. Saeed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0] that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
